N. B. Mruthyunjaya, M. Venkateshwarlu & B. R. Kiran, “PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY STATUS IN AYYANAKERE LAKE, CHIKMAGALORE DISTRICT, KARNATAKA”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME), Volume 2, Issue 2, Page Number 29-33, 2016
The present study is intended to know the status of primary productivity of freshwater Lake Ayyanakere, Karnataka. Primary productivity is determined by using standard ‘Light and Dark bottle’ method of Garden and Gran at an interval of every month for a period of one year from April 2008 to March 2009. Gross primary production in Ayyanakere recorded as 4.572 gC/m3/day, 9.1464 gC/m3/day and 6.4056 gC/m3/day. In the present study,GPP, NPP and CR was maximum in monsoon season and lowest in pre-monsoon season. The lowest yield was observed in pre-monsoon season when it was 4.572 gC/m3/day it is due to the decrease in the water level. The higher production was observed in monsoon due to high phytoplankton content.
Primary Productivity, Ayyanakere Lake, Seasons & Water Quality
1.Ahmed S.H and Singh A.K. 1989. Correlation between antibiotic factors of Water and zooplanktonic communities of a tank in Patna, Bihar. In Proc Nat Sem on forty years of Freshwater Aquaculture in India. Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar; 119-121.
2.APHA. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed., American Public Health Association, New York, 1143.
3.Chattopadhyay C and Banerjee T.C. Water Temperature and Primary Production in the Euphotic Zone of a Tropical Shallow Freshwater Lake Asian J Exp Sci 2008; 22(1):103-108.
4.Gajanan K. Sontakke and Satish S. Mokashe. 2014. Seasonal variation in primary productivity of two freshwater lakes of Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies 1 (6): 07-10
5.Gardner, T, Gran, H.H. 1927. Investigation of the production of plankton in the Oslo Fiord. Rapp. Et Proc-Verb. Cons Internat Explore Scient Mer Mediterr: 42:1-48.
6.Hepher, B. 1962. Primary production in fish ponds and its application to fertilization experiments. Limnol. Oceanog., 7 : 131-136.
7.McConnell, W.J. 1936. Primary productivity and fish harvest in a small desert impoundment. Trans. Am. Fisheries. Soc., 92: 1-12.
8.McConnell, W.J. 1965. Relationships of herbivore growth to rate of gross photosynthesis on microcosms. Limnol. Oceanogr., 19 :569-543.
9.Murphy, G.I. 1962. Effect of depth and turbidity on the productivity of freshwater impoundments. Trans. Am. Fisheries. Soc., 91: 69-76.
10.Odum E.P and Barrett G.W. Fundamentals of Ecology. Edn 5, Thomson Brooks Australia, 2008.
11.Prabhakar V.M, Vaidya S.P, Garud V.S and Swain K.K.2009. Trend in Primary Production in Khdakwasla Reservoir. 13th World Lake Conference, Wuhan, China.
12.Shara, V.K and D.K.Kaushal.2004. Ecology and fisheries of selected reservoirs of Southern Rajasthan. CIFRI Bulletin No.138, West Bengal: 1-39.
13.Sreenivasan, A. 1967. Primary Production and fish yield in a tropical impoundment, Stanley reservoir, Mettur dam, Madras state, South India. 35(2): 125-130.
14.Trivedi, R.K. and P.K. Goel. 1986. Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Environmental Publications, Aligarh.
15.Westlake D.F. 1963.Comparison of Plant Productivity. Botanical Research 25b 385-425.